Skip to main content

Three Gold Dome Bills Dunwoody Homeowners Should Be Concerned About

The Georgia legislative session begins today, January 13, 2020.

Within the wide range of bills being promoted are three that, if passed, will take large bites out of Dunwoody's budget and force taxes to be raised on Dunwoody homeowners.

HB 411

Sponsored by:  Brett Harrell (House District 106 - Snellville)

This bill would require that all services paid with local taxes be billed individually.  In Dunwoody, that would mean that water, sewer, sanitation - county services, etc would all require separate bills to be mailed to each homeowner.
It sounds innocuous but according to past Fianancial Director Chris Pike, the administration and printing and mailing costs would result in an additional $350,000 cost to the City of Dunwoody per year.   

HB 244

Sponsored by: Mary Margaret Oliver (House District 82 - Decatur)

This bill has been through several sessions and was stopped year after year by past Dunwoody legislators.
This bill will tax incorporated cities in DeKalb county in order to pay for county police administrative costs that did not downsize when cities provided their own police departments.  If passed, this bill will cost the City of Dunwoody $2.5M every year for 30 years.  
According to past State Rep Tom Taylor, this bill is intended to be punitive toward recently-incorporated cities in DeKalb County and to discourage further municipal incorporation.  Taylor says he learned this in a first-hand conversation with State Rep Oliver.

HB302

Sponsored by: Vance Smith (House District 133 - Columbus)

This bill is designed to restrict local governments (including cities) from enacting any zoning codes or ordinances that provide guidelines or boundaries on the construction of single-family homes and duplexes.
Dunwoody was incorporated for the very purpose of taking control of our own zoning so that locally-elected officials would make decisions close to home that they themselves would have to live with.
If passed, this bill would nullify comprehensive plans developed by Dunwoody citizens to direct their community's character in the future.

Dunwoody is a city that was founded for self-determination.  DeKalb County didn't meet our homeowners' needs so we created a city to address them.  There may be conflicts and hard times but we face them together, solve them together, live with the results together.  Potential threats to our self-determination are no longer just from DeKalb County politicians, but also from other areas of the state.

To preserve our city, control our taxes, and direct our municipal funds toward the projects and amenities that benefit Dunwoody homeowners, we must ask our elected officials to oppose these bills.  DHA is in the process of soliciting feedback from State Sen. Sally Harrell and State Rep Wilensky.  When their comments are available, they will be added.  It is essential that all Dunwoody citizens who want the right to set our own ordinances and pay for our own amenities speak up and speak out against this proposed legislation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Look Back at Dunwoody's Recovery from the 1998 Tornado

 An Editorial by the late Dick Williams in the Atlanta Journal Constitution April 12, 1999 https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/1999/04/12/editorial4.html One doesn't have to listen to the Clark Howard program on WSB radio to hear that species of American known as The Whiners. It's enough just to follow the news or surf the cable box. (Click) In a nation of boundless hope, here's the Rev. Jesse Jackson urging us to keep hope alive. (Click) In a metro area that's projecting 1.8 million new jobs in 25 years, here's Mayor Bill Campbell of Atlanta proclaiming that every black person in town owes his or her living to affirmative discrimination. (Click) When disaster strikes, counselors are rushed to schools. (Click) "If you can't get help at ... seek help somewhere." The notions of individualism and of turning to family, church and school for support too often are obliterated by the culture of victimhood, or societal subgroups based on us a

Letter from DHA Board to Dunwoody City Council Regarding Code Compliance

   October 2020 To:   Dunwoody Mayor & City Council Re:   Need for Improved Code Compliance At its March board meeting, the Dunwoody Homeowners Association held a discussion about opportunities for improved code enforcement.   Several of our board members personally observed commercial areas with covered windows and gang tags. The former represents a serious safety lapse when police are called to a location; the latter is a blatant expression of organized crime. The board voted to compose a letter expressing these concerns to city council.   Soon afterwards, the coronavirus pandemic hit and the proposal was tabled while our community faced a crisis that seemed more immediate. While the community waited for some return to normalcy, the issues that originally raised our concern have worsened.   Gang tags that “mark territory” have advanced further from commercial areas into single family neighborhoods. Dunwoody incorporated to provide better services to the residents.  

Updated Statement on the Proposed Rezoning of 5308, 5318, and 5328 Roberts Drive

  To:          Dunwoody City Council                Zoning Board of Appeals   Re:          RZ 20-02 Rezoning of 5308, 5318, and 5328 Roberts Drive The Board of Directors met virtually on Thursday, October 22 to discuss our position on the proposed rezoning.   A quorum of the board voted unanimously to oppose the rezoning of these properties from R-100 to R-50.   The DHA has stayed in contact with adjacent homeowners since our original position statement was issued and we felt it necessary to update our position. A rezoning that close, to allow 15 homes to be built, requires several variances to be feasible.   These variances will result in the development imposing on existing neighborhoods and diminishing the owners’ quality of life and risks damage to the current homes themselves. A variance is requested that will increase the total impervious surface of the properties from 40% to 85%.   We believe this change, if enacted will cause environmental damage to nearby neighborh